News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The strange story of “Extended Random” by weinzierl on Saturday December 23, 2017 @05:03PM (#15996501)
Do these printers use Dual_EC_DRBG too (in addition to Extended Random), to make them actually vulnerable?

> Ironically, the printers are now the only thing that still exhibits the features of this (now deprecated) version of BSAFE. This is not because the NSA was targeting printers. Whatever devices they were targeting are probably gone by now. It’s because printer firmware tends to be obsolete and yet highly persistent. It’s like a remote pool buried beneath the arctic circle that preserves software species that would otherwise vanish from the Internet.

Pretty chilling, but on the other hand: If this was true it should be possible to prove digging through firmware archives and actually finding these targeted devices.

Re:The strange story of “Extended Random” by tptacek on Saturday December 23, 2017 @09:07PM (#15997491)
This is a really good question. Is it published anywhere that this version of BSAFE enabled Dual_EC?
Re:The strange story of “Extended Random” by adzm on Saturday December 23, 2017 @10:30PM (#15997743)
> From 2004 to 2013, the default CSPRNG in BSAFE was Dual_EC_DRBG
Re:The strange story of “Extended Random” by tptacek on Saturday December 23, 2017 @10:43PM (#15997804)
I believe you, and think I remember reading this before. BSAFE is batshit.