Re:Mattermark (YC S12) to shut down after selling to FullCon...
by lenley on Thursday December 28, 2017 @01:06PM
(#16023671)
That aggressiveness gets noticed and picked up by lots of different outlets -- from tech aggregators to mainstream business publications looking for "punchy" topics. E.g. look at who appears on CNBC programs.
Unfortunately, people have made that into a marketing strategy -- I'm not sure it is something to really hold against Mattermark in particular.
Re:Mattermark (YC S12) to shut down after selling to FullCon...
by minimaxir on Friday December 22, 2017 @01:00PM
(#15989467)
Notably, there's been complaints that the TechCrunch article is too negative (https://twitter.com/sm/status/944087102982995969), which has the inverse problem.
Re:Mattermark (YC S12) to shut down after selling to FullCon...
by jpeg_hero on Friday December 22, 2017 @02:58PM
(#15990430)
Yeah, unreal. Hey @sm give me $17m and I’ll give you $1m back and we’ll gauge your positivity/negativity.
This is the stuff that gives SV a bad reputation- the sense of entitlement. That of course we deserve “others people’s money” to do with what we please and should be praised for it.
This is real money @sm !!
Take, for instance, this post, in which she seemingly boasts of the company’s massive burn rate: https://medium.com/@DanielleMorrill/is-my-startup-burn-rate-...
Or this post, in which she shames a number of “Zombie Unicorns” (including WeWork): http://www.businessinsider.com/mattermark-names-troubled-uni...
Why be so publicly hostile and truculent?
Also, it appears that the CEO lacked focus: according to her Twitter profile, she’s a VC and a very prolific angel investor. I’d be upset as an employee of the company receiving $0 for my common stock that the CEO was effectively hedging her Mattermark bet with a number of side gigs. The CEO’s job is to be singularly focused on the success of the company.