News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Long Island Iced Tea Soars 500% After Changing Its Name t... by ghaff on Thursday December 21, 2017 @10:41AM (#15979515)
I'm pretty sure the opposite is true. Many people are already invested in stocks and, even in the .com bubble, many had accounts with etrade and the like--some of which were part of the bubble itself. All you had to do was transfer your cash/stocks to pets.com or whatever.

With bitcoin, you have to sign up for/transfer money to various sketchy exchanges that you've never previously used.

Re:Long Island Iced Tea Soars 500% After Changing Its Name t... by fullshark on Thursday December 21, 2017 @11:50AM (#15980392)
E trade and Ameritrade were new companies at the time. Buying stocks on your own without your bank/a brokerage was not commonplace actually and that was a pretty substantial barrier to entry.
Re:Long Island Iced Tea Soars 500% After Changing Its Name t... by ghaff on Thursday December 21, 2017 @12:54PM (#15981056)
Well, those are brokerages. I assume what you mean is that it was more common to call your broker on the phone and place an order (at a fairly high fee in most cases). That's fair. Even in the US, online trading really came in contemporaneously with the dot-com era. That said, even the newish online brokerages were regulated to a degree we don't see with cryptocurrencies.
Re:Long Island Iced Tea Soars 500% After Changing Its Name t... by fullshark on Friday December 22, 2017 @12:19AM (#15985423)
Yes that's a more accurate characterization.
Re:Long Island Iced Tea Soars 500% After Changing Its Name t... by spdionis on Thursday December 21, 2017 @11:02AM (#15979750)
What are you talking about? Most people in the world barely have access to buy stocks, especially US stocks, without not-so-minor annoyances.