News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Might Be Eating Cactus in the Future by DoreenMichele on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @03:32PM (#15963966)
The HN title is worse than the already bad article title as it loses the implied "some people already do this, but it may become a lot more mainstream/widespread as it works well as a solution to some of our current global challenges."

How do you create a title conveying that without it being hyperbolic click-bait while keeping it at 80 characters or less? I have no clue. But that's the gist of this article.

Re:We Might Be Eating Cactus in the Future by ksenzee on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @04:09PM (#15964285)
Cactus to Be More Common Food in Future
Re:We Might Be Eating Cactus in the Future by QAPereo on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @03:42PM (#15964062)
Some Already Do, But Eating Cactus May Become Mainstream Under Global Pressures.

Not perfect, but it took me 10 seconds, and of course, is less inviting to clicks.

Re:We Might Be Eating Cactus in the Future by curtis on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @04:22PM (#15964422)
I think I originally submitted it with the title "We’ll All Be Eating Cactus in the Future", mostly because I thought the "eating cactus" part was more interesting than the "climate change" part.
Re:We Might Be Eating Cactus in the Future by Falling3 on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @05:02PM (#15964805)
The "Some already do" part seems awfully unnecessary.
Re:We Might Be Eating Cactus in the Future by QAPereo on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @05:11PM (#15964884)
A fair portion of the world actually already eats cactus on a regular basis.