News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WhatsApp told to stop sharing user data with Facebook by ... by geofft on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @01:44PM (#15962768)
That seems reasonable - as long as the US maintains its protectionist stance of not letting people born in France compete for jobs on a level playing field with people born in the US, why should France allow employers in the US to compete on a level playing field with employers in France?

(Are you counting protectionist immigration laws as part of countries' industrial-governmental complexes?)

Re:WhatsApp told to stop sharing user data with Facebook by ... by jlavine on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @02:10PM (#15963080)
But that goes both ways: It's no easier for an American to move to and work in France than for a Frenchman to do so in the US. There are plenty of Americans who would love to make the move - to gain quality of life at the expense of a big chunk of their salary - if it weren't for immigration restrictions. A fairer comparison would ask whether the US government has taken any actions against European companies operating in the US similar to those enacted or threatened by Europe against Microsoft, Google, Facebook.
Re:WhatsApp told to stop sharing user data with Facebook by ... by weberc2 on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @02:34PM (#15963373)
This was my experience when I looked into moving to France from the US a few years ago. I agree with your conclusion as well--this comparison is not a good one.
Re:WhatsApp told to stop sharing user data with Facebook by ... by i_am_nomad on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @02:00PM (#15962977)
I would argue that immigration laws are not strictly economic or commercial policies. You’re drawing a false equivalence.
Re:WhatsApp told to stop sharing user data with Facebook by ... by jyrkesh on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @01:55PM (#15962914)
I could be reading it wrong, but your post came across as overly combative and an appeal to whataboutism.

I'd say both are protectionist and both are wrong. My interpretation of your parent was simply that it is protectionist of France to be doing this (and I'd argue that makes it as wrong as the American protectionism that you brought up).