News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by JoshMnem on Monday December 18, 2017 @04:51PM (#15955838)
If you're serious about blogging, using Medium is a mistake, especially for programming blogs. Using a static site generator on Netlify is also free, and you maintain full control.

I would not have been able to sell one of my blogs if I had used a platform like Medium or Tumblr.

I've also seen someone's blog get deleted on a different hosted platform without warning and no way to recover the deleted content. If you don't control your application, you are at the mercy of another, unknown person's decisions.

Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by TaylorGood on Monday December 18, 2017 @05:23PM (#15956059)
What about a personal site using Wordpress then repost on Medium for exposure?
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by JoshMnem on Monday December 18, 2017 @11:59PM (#15957882)
I wouldn't duplicate the content for SEO reasons, even with canonical URLs. You can get a lot of traffic through search engines and other methods.

I don't like landing on Medium posts. That kind of centralized, fast-food publishing monoculture isn't what the WWW is supposed to be. I don't comment on or "like" anything on Medium either. If it were a relatively small site, it wouldn't be such a problem, but it's becoming inescapable now.

I think that tech culture needs a revamp where people start to focus on DIY freedom again: blogs, websites, OSes, hardware, RSS/Atom (vs. AI feeds), etc.

Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by amigoingtodie on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @01:30AM (#15958204)
From your description, it sounds like medium is the next technorati?
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by Kagerjay on Monday December 18, 2017 @06:50PM (#15956578)
you can do that but you should look up canonical linking and seo rules for duplicated content
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by user5994461 on Monday December 18, 2017 @05:05PM (#15955938)
Static site don't have comments and analytics.
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by darekkay on Monday December 18, 2017 @08:43PM (#15957107)
I've got a static blog with both. You don't even need JavaScript for analytics, when using something like GoAccess[0] (I haven't noticed any meaningful differences after switching).

[0] https://goaccess.io/

Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by DeGi on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @02:59AM (#15958530)
GoAccess seems like a great tool. Thanks for pointing it out!
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by drdrey on Monday December 18, 2017 @11:41PM (#15957814)
They absolutely can, with something like Disqus for comments and Google Analytics or whatever other analytics you like
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by JoshMnem on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @12:03AM (#15957892)
Or DIY with something like this:

https://github.com/posativ/isso

or this:

https://blog.webkid.io/moving-from-disqus-to-schnack/

You could also install Discourse on a subdomain (quick docker-based install on a $5/month server) and use that for comments.

Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by KajMagnus on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @03:20AM (#15958611)
Or this: https://www.kajmagnus.blog/new-embedded-comments/ (open source like Isso and Schnack, or hosted for those who don't want to install anything)
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by acheron on Monday December 18, 2017 @08:12PM (#15956991)
Yes, those are advantages too.
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by thomasmeeks on Monday December 18, 2017 @05:24PM (#15956062)
Sure they can, static site generators can still include client-side javascript.
Re:Ten years of professional blogging – what I’ve learned by bo1024 on Monday December 18, 2017 @10:52PM (#15957599)
Nor do you need javascript for basic comments* or analytics.

*if your site is spammed hard enough, javascript may become necessary, but you can try honeypot fields first in pure HTML.