From a country which lived under an authoritative regime and who knows what censorship will lead to.

Hmm I misread your comment.

Still, a private company can do whatever it wants.

Fact is, regardless, Twitter will never censor Trump or it’ll be the end of Twitter.

But still, it’s a private company that’s not FCC regulated (yet).

Sure, Twitter is currently a private company. However, it's also a major forum used in the expression of speech in our country. At what point is a public website considered a public forum?

If we have a constitutional right to free speech, and the majority of Americans use a certain website for speech, why shouldn't their constitutional rights extend onto that site?

> why shouldn't their constitutional rights extend onto that site?

Because their involvement with Twitter is at will, because Twitter is a private institution, and because privacy is scared to our freedom. But mostly perhaps because twitter has not yet been designated a common carrier by the government, which many people are suggesting. I don’t really see twitter as a good fit for that, but then again, I’m not a legal scholar or lawmaker.

I'd say it's exactly because the US is not an authoritative regime that the same rules should apply for both random nobodies and the President.