Re:Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion (1869)
by yesenadam on Saturday December 16, 2017 @10:18PM
(#15943851)
Well, evidently I don't think it's invalid. Just asserting that doesn't achieve much. I haven't given this a great deal of thought, but it seems the specific emotions are so far irrelevant; what is relevant is whether an action causes harm, or may be predicted to do so/usually does so.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion (1869)
by austincheney on Saturday December 16, 2017 @10:25PM
(#15943882)
> Well, evidently I don't think it's invalid.
Fortunately, courts in the US do not have trouble discerning this difference.