Re:An Anarchist Critique of Democracy (2005)
by JetSpiegel on Saturday December 16, 2017 @09:54PM
(#15943752)
I would argue anarchism has been tried in the past, it was simply called feudalism. Since it lead to the Dark Ages, there's not much support for it nowadays.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An Anarchist Critique of Democracy (2005)
by danharaj on Saturday December 16, 2017 @10:07PM
(#15943799)
That is a really hot take. Anarchism developed as a response to industrialization and the transformation of society caused by the adoption of capitalist modes of production.
Re:An Anarchist Critique of Democracy (2005)
by jessaustin on Saturday December 16, 2017 @11:26PM
(#15944097)
Anarchy is opposition to arbitrary authority. Wasn't feudalism the opposite of that?
Re:An Anarchist Critique of Democracy (2005)
by TheCoelacanth on Saturday December 16, 2017 @11:58PM
(#15944218)
That's absurb. Anarchism is a system completely without land ownership (i.e. "property is theft"). Feudalism is a system based almost entirely around land ownership (named after the word feodum meaning a grant of land in exchange for service).
Re:An Anarchist Critique of Democracy (2005)
by LyndsySimon on Sunday December 17, 2017 @03:17AM
(#15944785)
> Anarchism is a system completely without land ownership (i.e. "property is theft")
Not all forms of anarchism subscribe to this.