>would already have shown this to be a terrible idea.
What are you basing this on?
I'm just a FF user, and I don't think it was a terrible idea, even though I personally wouldn't have gone that route.
What are you basing this on?
I'm just a FF user, and I don't think it was a terrible idea, even though I personally wouldn't have gone that route.
He's suggesting that the most simple, stupid check one could think of (polling random employees) would already have shown this to be a terrible idea. They didn't even go that far. That is indeed a bad sign.