News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anil Dash's analysis of Sam Altman's free speach essay by coolgeek on Saturday December 16, 2017 @12:35PM (#15940533)
> To say something and receive "mean words" or "consequences" can usually means that nobody is engaging your argument.

Advocating genocide (e.g.) is not deserving of engagement.

Anyone attempting to persuade you that genocide is in any way beneficial to humanity is not going to be persuaded by your "open and honest" counterargument. Their intent isn't even to persuade you. Their intent is to persuade other viewers of your argument that "reasonable people can disagree"

Re:Anil Dash's analysis of Sam Altman's free speach essay by FeepingCreature on Tuesday December 19, 2017 @02:33PM (#15963357)
I'm more worried about people trying to make themselves the authority on what is or isn't permitted to be deserving of engagement, than I'm about people advocating genocide. For one, there's a lot more of the former and they seem to be getting more all the time.