Re:Statistics, we have a problem
by lightcatcher on Saturday December 16, 2017 @11:07AM
(#15940107)
This is the closest to a zero tolerance response to something not clear-cut predatory that I've seen:
https://www.facebook.com/Pinegroveband/posts/101557485055597...
Musician cancels his band's tour because of non-public accusation of "sexual coercion" in a relationship. What were his other options when someone presented this claim to him, presumably with some probability of the claim going public?
Re:Statistics, we have a problem
by discoursism on Saturday December 16, 2017 @02:44PM
(#15941511)
Who is the party who is imposing zero-tolerance here? The band leader disclosed the problem and also decided the "punishment," such as it was. I understand that you're just one person and are not representing this finding as the maximally bad situation. But I would say that if this is the worst that can be found, it's clear to me that we're in no immediate danger of jump-the-gun, zero-tolerance situations becoming common.
I think companies and society have always had a clear consensus on these issues; the recent events have merely been pointing out that 'ignore and suppress' isn't a very good response.