This article is basically case in point for me.

"why it's dangerous and wrong"

"most awful example"

"become actually dangerous, in ways he is unwilling or unable to understand"

The author intentionally (mis)interprets sama's writing in the least charitable way and then spends the rest of it arguing a strawman (with insults sprinkled throughout) ending with a comparison to nazis.

If I wasn't sure I agreed with Sama before, I'm definitely more inclined to now.