News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by teamhappy on Friday December 15, 2017 @03:01PM (#15934580)
> What if it was an official marathon where they run with very strong winds at their back.

The courses need to follow certain rules to mitigate the effect of tailwinds, slopes and things like that. That's why Boston isn't eligible for world records.

Here's the rule: "The start and finish points of a course, measured along a theoretical straight line between them, shall not be further apart than 50% of the race distance." (http://www.aims-worldrunning.org/world-records.html)

Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by appleiigs on Friday December 15, 2017 @03:28PM (#15934798)
Ok cool. Thanks for the information.

But just to address the original comments: "It's a little insulting to marathon runners to claim this is a 'marathon' IMO.".... We do consider the Boston Marathon to be a marathon, right?

Re:Nike’s Two Hour Marathon Attempt by gamblor956 on Friday December 15, 2017 @03:49PM (#15934966)
They're different types of marathon.

Boston is a real marathon, run on a hilly course in whatever the weather is on the day of the race. This has meant rainstorms, 80+ degree weather, and everything in between.

Nike's WR attempt is an experimental marathon, run on a track shielded from the wind, on a date and time chosen based on the temperature, cloud cover, and wind forecasts to be ideal for human long-distance performance running.