News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Communicating Advanced Mathematics to Kids by mathgenius on Friday December 15, 2017 @12:32PM (#15933435)
I hated learning the multiplication table when I was 5. Basically, I boycotted the whole thing. It occured to me recently, why don't they talk about the holes in the multiplication table? These are the prime numbers! So easy to mention this and may have inspired my 5 year old self to dig a bit deeper.

My first real mathematical experience was in second grade. My teacher had some hoops on the floor, and was putting coloured shapes inside. Red shapes in one hoop, and triangles in another hoop. But then the problem arose: what to do with the red triangles? It was total magic when she dragged one hoop to overlap with another hoop and placed the red triangle in the overlap. Venn diagrams for six year olds.

And I still can't multiply six times eight! I have to work it out every time...

Re:Communicating Advanced Mathematics to Kids by vog on Saturday December 16, 2017 @06:21AM (#15939012)
> And I still can't multiply six times eight! I have to work it out every time...

No offense intended, but if that still bothers you, it's time to learn it.

Either by accepting the offer you got with 5 (that is, memorizing the multiplication table - BTW, it is more fun to do this with 15x15 or 20x20 rather than 10x10).

Or by playing mental calculation games and trying to get high scores in speed.

(Essentially, this is the same as with learning vocabularies for a foreign language. The word "4x3" is translated to the other word "12".)

Maybe your teachers failed to make it interesting to your 5-year-old self. But your current self does seem to be interested, so that can't be the issue anymore.

You can critize your teachers that they didn't make your learn it at 5, but you can't critize them for still not having it learned later as an adult.

Re:Communicating Advanced Mathematics to Kids by dragonwriter on Friday December 15, 2017 @06:24PM (#15936158)
> It occured to me recently, why don't they talk about the holes in the multiplication table?

Because there aren't any. The prime numbers would be gaps if you pivoted the table into a division table but, alas, that's not how it's presented (even in the context of teaching division.)