News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Etsy Announces Move to Google Cloud by azurezyq on Thursday December 14, 2017 @03:19PM (#15926557)
Operation cost is only one side. There are more things:

* Well designed security / encryption may cost a lot.

* Compliance may be a pain.

* multi-DC and HA

* Surge resource usage over holidays.

* "Sleeping" resources at night or wasted.

Re:Etsy Announces Move to Google Cloud by ehsankia on Thursday December 14, 2017 @05:08PM (#15927624)
There's also just all sorts of other extra features you may get for free. These are things that may not be worth it for you to spend precious dev time developing, but since cloud providers can make it once and offer it to thousands of customers, it makes much more sense. You can look at the full list of GCP features [0], and it's growing every month.

[0] https://cloud.google.com/products/

Re:Etsy Announces Move to Google Cloud by lethargic_meat on Friday December 15, 2017 @12:23AM (#15929830)
A critical security issue in public cloud is that users often misunderstand what infrastructure security entails.

I've been in public cloud pitches that sold their security measures as a golden standard that made my managers believe there's no need for a security team anymore. No need for protocols or proper architecture as x cloud has enough flashy certifications.

Re:Etsy Announces Move to Google Cloud by tedmiston on Thursday December 14, 2017 @03:48PM (#15926863)
Support for auto-scaling services in a self-managed environment too