Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by chasingsparks on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @05:01PM
(#159249)
While a watched kettle never seems to boil, my ruby script that scanned for a pg comment did signal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by rrival on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @09:56PM
(#159448)
I have one of those new fast ones. I watched. It boils.
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by hooande on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @05:04PM
(#159252)
You gotta share that script or give it a web address
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by chasingsparks on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @05:31PM
(#159291)
hooande
just replace the to and from number and excuse the lack of any error correcting. go out, get a beer, and wait.
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by nostrademons on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @08:31PM
(#159394)
You know that you can scan for his replies on any thread by using the http://news.ycombinator.com/newcomments link, right? Just in case someone starts another "YC e-mails are out!" thread?
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by chasingsparks on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @08:40PM
(#159398)
I did not know about that feature. Thanks.
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by chasingsparks on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @05:35PM
(#159295)
oh, i guess i should mention. it sends a SMS to a sprint phone via Sprint's www interface. i do not know (nor do i care) if it works for other cell phones. you can see if it does by setting the starting_count variable to 0.
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by pgfake on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @06:52PM
(#159343)
So if I make a user called "pgfake" can I make your script send you text messages? Neat.
Re:Ask YC: When can we expect to know our YC application sta...
by chasingsparks on Wednesday April 09, 2008 @07:44PM
(#159371)
Well, actually, if you wanted to generate a false positive, all you had to do was paste the regex text, but why?