News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Limits to Growth (1972) [pdf] by muxator on Thursday December 14, 2017 @10:44AM (#15923121)
From a purely logic point of view, I have some problems accepting this:

> "When the facts change, I change my mind," I included because of its implied inverse: "When the facts don't change, I don't change my mind."

It is my understanding that "A implies B" does not imply "not A implies not B".

Maybe I am just hairsplitting, but when I read/hear something I see these kind of sentences as bad indicators.

Re:The Limits to Growth (1972) [pdf] by zardo on Thursday December 14, 2017 @11:29AM (#15923553)
The trouble with applying formal logic to natural language, is in the translation.

You are interpreting "when" as indicating an implication, it could also be an 'if and only if'.

Re:The Limits to Growth (1972) [pdf] by muxator on Thursday December 14, 2017 @11:52AM (#15923874)
I know what you mean. It took me some effort to accept that, in natural language, an "exponential growth" was not really meant to be exponential. One has to live with it. :)
Re:The Limits to Growth (1972) [pdf] by zardo on Thursday December 14, 2017 @12:32PM (#15924283)
It sounds like you displeasure with incorrect use of 'exponential growth' may declining exponentially with your exposure to it.
Re:The Limits to Growth (1972) [pdf] by DennisP on Thursday December 14, 2017 @12:57PM (#15924567)
Well, sometimes it's meant that way. If you want your economy to keep growing at 2% per year, that really is exponential growth.