News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on So You Want To Be A Ruby Dev.

Re:So You Want To Be A Ruby Dev by thibaut_barrere on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @12:05PM (#1591955)
You could write the same article for most in-depth subjects.

Want to try model airplanes ? Get ready to spend a couple of days just to figure out the various materials, radios etc

Want to try computer assisted music ? Which plugin ? Which host ? How do I write music with this, etc ?

You could even rewrite the article for Java a few years back at least (should I go WebLogic ? WebSphere ? TomCat ? Struts or something else ?).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:So You Want To Be A Ruby Dev by bho on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @02:06PM (#1592401)
i think the deal is that it wasn't like this for ruby before.(and it still really isn't, but rails has grown exponentially)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:So You Want To Be A Ruby Dev by bphogan on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @02:39PM (#1592519)
It's been like this with Ruby since certain developers have been pushing harder for 1.9 adoption. A new developer is gonna pick the higher version number, cos higher version means newer. They're then gonna wonder why some gem doesn't work :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:So You Want To Be A Ruby Dev by zem on Wednesday August 11, 2010 @04:32AM (#1594191)
to be fair, there are lots of very real advantages to 1.9. the development community finally seems to have collectively decided to take the plunge, and let the gems catch up, rather than waiting around on 1.8 forever.
[ Parent | on HN ]