Re:A list of ways to “Break the Internet” for the 48 hours b...
by sushisource on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @06:11PM
(#15910377)
I think the overall point of the article is solid, but this sentence is laughable:
"Again, zero-rating is not explicitly a net-neutrality issue: T-Mobile treats all data the same, some data just doesn’t cost money."
Right. Interesting definition of "same".
Re:A list of ways to “Break the Internet” for the 48 hours b...
by remarkEon on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @06:25PM
(#15910495)
I don't see how that's wrong? Nothing is being done to the packets.
Re:A list of ways to “Break the Internet” for the 48 hours b...
by peeters on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @08:11PM
(#15911128)
Except that they're charging you for some of them? There is no structural difference between zero rating certain traffic and adding surcharges for certain traffic.
Re:A list of ways to “Break the Internet” for the 48 hours b...
by tc313 on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @06:11PM
(#15910378)
At the risk of splitting hairs, Thompson actually argued in favor of mandating net neutrality, but against the stringent Title II regulations. He also argued that re-classifying ISPs would not necessarily lead to the end of net neutrality.
Re:A list of ways to “Break the Internet” for the 48 hours b...
by remarkEon on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @06:24PM
(#15910485)
You're correct, and I was perhaps assuming too much that people have kept up with his writing on this topic.
Re:A list of ways to “Break the Internet” for the 48 hours b...
by DoreenMichele on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @06:43PM
(#15910610)
That is definitely assuming too much when answering an explain it like I'm 5 type question.
[1] https://stratechery.com/2017/pro-neutrality-anti-title-ii/