Re:Near-miss math provides exact representations of almost-r...
by TeMPOraL on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @04:07PM
(#15909477)
I'd say it doesn't, and that's precisely why it might be a fertile ground for new mathematics. Like it was with e.g. complex numbers, aka. "let's assume that this thing, which clearly doesn't make sense, exists, and let's consider how it behaves".
Does it makes sense to do statistical analysis on near-misses like it is done in experimental science in order to find if it is just a coincidence or if it warrants more attention?
For example: estimate the entropy of a formula and compare it to the error margin.