News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Homebrew 1.4.0 by zakk on Monday December 11, 2017 @03:11PM (#15899979)
MacPorts user here. Uses case are the same, but:

- MacPorts does not track you by default with Google analytics.

- MacPorts lives by default in a self-contained directory tree.

- MacPorts tends to be more stable than Homebrew, but that’s just my personal experience.

- I didn’t like the slogans Homebrew used for years, implying MacPorts wasn’t good quality.

Re:Homebrew 1.4.0 by mschuster91 on Monday December 11, 2017 @04:54PM (#15900868)
Also Macports works in a multi user environment without problems (as long as one either gives all users sudo access or sudo port access).
Re:Homebrew 1.4.0 by zbentley on Monday December 11, 2017 @06:28PM (#15901736)
Does MacPorts have anything like Homebrew Cask? I know it's technically a plugin/addon, but it owes its existence to the Homebrew tooling and ecosystem it's on top of.

The ability to very easily install full GUI apps, or closed-source ones, is absolutely indispensable for automatically configuring Macs in many large environments, especially those (like a former one of mine) that heavily used Puppet for provisioning.

If MacPorts is lacking in that "umbrella package manager" functionality, I'd be stuck using both it and cask if I switched (and, given my positive experiences with Homebrew core and cask, I have no plans to).

Re:Homebrew 1.4.0 by zakk on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @05:56AM (#15904569)
The MacPorts system is flexible enough that you can use it to install any kind of software.

Honestly I don't know if that's popular, when using Homebrew and MacPorts I was always installing open source stuff...