Re:Design Principles
by gffrd on Monday December 11, 2017 @11:17AM
(#15897975)
Could it be interpreted two ways?*
If the purpose of design is to solve a truly valuable problem or introduce pleasure to a process, and if these possibilities—if we're honest with ourselves—do not exist to be solved, one cannot innovate, therefore one cannot design.
A honeypot to the those who see design as surface, a challenge and call to arms to those who see it as more?
(*I'm curious if anyone knows what this type of phrase is, one that can be interpreted in two different, opposing ways. Best I can tell is _polysemy_)
If the purpose of design is to solve a truly valuable problem or introduce pleasure to a process, and if these possibilities—if we're honest with ourselves—do not exist to be solved, one cannot innovate, therefore one cannot design.
A honeypot to the those who see design as surface, a challenge and call to arms to those who see it as more?
(*I'm curious if anyone knows what this type of phrase is, one that can be interpreted in two different, opposing ways. Best I can tell is _polysemy_)