News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The illustrated guide to a Ph.D. by pgbovine on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:40PM (#1589696)
I will say without hesitation that it's wrong to consider the only way to increase the sum total of human knowledge is to grant someone a Ph.D.

agreed, but i don't think anyone was arguing this point, though

the contrapositive of:

PhD --> novel contribution to human knowledge

is certainly not:

!(PhD) --> !(novel contribution to human knowledge)

Re:The illustrated guide to a Ph.D. by dlsspy on Monday August 09, 2010 @07:24PM (#1589865)
That's just how I read this:

    You push at the boundary for a few years
    Until one day, the boundary gives way
    And, that dent you've made is called a Ph.D.
It seems to me that calling the expansion of human knowledge a Ph.D. implies that those who don't have Ph.D.s have not dented the circle.