News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:It's easier to port a shell than a shell script by dctoedt on Monday August 09, 2010 @05:56PM (#1589561)
The story reminded me of an analogous experience I had some years ago. A client asked me to help negotiate a software license agreement drafted by the other side’s lawyer. I saw that the other lawyer had selectively copied and edited a set of model software license provisions developed by an ABA committee. It amused my client when, on the negotiation conference call, I pointed out to the other lawyer that he had left out certain language that had been included in the model provisions to make them a reasonable compromise on the issue in question. The other lawyer was a bit discomfited when he realized that I was the lead author of the model provisions and the chairman of the drafting committee. (This actually happened twice, in the space of just a few days, for two different clients.)
Re:It's easier to port a shell than a shell script by roel_v on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @07:15AM (#1591127)
I hate to send people email out of the blue so I'm just asking permission first - can I email you for a career advice question?
Re:It's easier to port a shell than a shell script by dctoedt on Monday August 16, 2010 @07:38PM (#1609695)
Sure - sorry it's taken so long to respond, I haven't looked at this post in awhile.