News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Public Policy Blog: A joint policy proposal for an... by illumin8 on Monday August 09, 2010 @05:46PM (#1589528)
I don't think this is a good precedent. What happens when you want HDTV and each channel is 20 megabits? Well, your Telstra connection gets upgraded to 50 megabits but only 40 is available for TV - 2 HD channels at the same time, and the remaining 10 Meg is for Internet. Now, you have a situation where you can get 2 simultaneous HDTV feeds from Telstra but you can not get a single feed from an Internet TV provider, because they only give you 10 Meg for Internet. This is EXACTLY what net neutrality is supposed to prevent.

I'll say it again. Google says they want to push network neutrality but they just created a loophole big enough to drive a truck through.

Re:Google Public Policy Blog: A joint policy proposal for an... by moultano on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:30PM (#1589667)
>Google says they want to push network neutrality but they just created a loophole big enough to drive a truck through.

Keep in mind, they did get Verizon to agree to it. That's strictly more restrictions than they've agreed to in the past.

Re:Google Public Policy Blog: A joint policy proposal for an... by illumin8 on Monday August 09, 2010 @06:59PM (#1589781)
They got Verizon to agree to what exactly? Being able to provide enhanced TV and other services over IP that aren't constrained to any net neutrality guidelines? LOL
Re:Google Public Policy Blog: A joint policy proposal for an... by moultano on Monday August 09, 2010 @08:02PM (#1589961)
They've always been able to do that. They agreed to:

Consumer Protections: A broadband Internet access service provider would be prohibited from preventing users of its broadband Internet access service from-- (1) sending and receiving lawful content of their choice; (2) running lawful applications and using lawful services of their choice; and (3) connecting their choice of legal devices that do not harm the network or service, facilitate theft of service, or harm other users of the service. Non-

Discrimination Requirement:In providing broadband Internet access service, a provider would be prohibited from engaging in undue discrimination against any lawful Internet content, application, or service in a manner that causes meaningful harm to competition or to users. Prioritization of Internet traffic would be presumed inconsistent with the non-discrimination standard, but the presumption could be rebutted.

Re:Google Public Policy Blog: A joint policy proposal for an... by rfugger on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @12:33AM (#1590466)
Just turn off the dedicated TV, leaving 50 megabits for internet.
Re:Google Public Policy Blog: A joint policy proposal for an... by illumin8 on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @09:32AM (#1591378)
What if your ISP reserves those 40 megabits for only THEIR IPTV traffic - all other carriers get to fight over the remaining 10. This is exactly the scenario that net neutrality is supposed to prevent - and exactly the scenario the Goorizon want to create.

Youtube and FIOS get the fast lane- everyone else gets leftover bandwidth.