News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by alexpetralia on Sunday December 10, 2017 @10:02AM (#15891667)
In the spirit of efficacy, browser injection may have a better response rate than email. Taking this to its next logical step, surely showing up in-person at your door is even more effective.

Is that the idea here?

Or does this efficacy come at some cost (namely, the sentiment behind this thread)?

Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by epicide on Sunday December 10, 2017 @10:47AM (#15891885)
With all the junk mail I get from my cable company about "upgrading" my service to include some crap I don't want, I would think they could find a way to slip in a "hey, your modem's busted" notice.
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by rietta on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:21AM (#15892050)
So they print Important Plan Information on the envelope.
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by nerdponx on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:41AM (#15892153)
Time-Sensitive, Open Immediately

You know it's actually an important piece of mail when the envelope isn't imploring you to open it.

Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by beamatronic on Sunday December 10, 2017 @12:26PM (#15892380)
The most serious snail mail correspondence is utterly and completely plain.
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by rietta on Sunday December 10, 2017 @01:08PM (#15892597)
On the from line - Office of Legal Counsel...that’s getting opened.
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by santoshalper on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:20AM (#15892043)
But you probably wouldn't read it, because lots of people don't read their email (at least partially because of the junk).
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by JoBrad on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:31AM (#15892102)
Yes, but if you don’t get the speed Comcast promises you, and you paid attention to that, then you’d call them up, and find out that way.

More work, but way less scummy.

Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by serf on Sunday December 10, 2017 @06:18PM (#15894040)
regional monopolies have never cared about scummy behavior.
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by epicide on Sunday December 10, 2017 @05:18PM (#15893795)
And I'm more likely to read a pop-up?
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by sjg007 on Sunday December 10, 2017 @03:42PM (#15893395)
Maybe in the bill? Or online bill notification?
Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by metaphor on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:04AM (#15891971)
I don't know what's worse: the straw man attempt at arguing efficacy while focusing on the weaker of two suggested options, or the (presumably) unscalable slippery slope of dispatching personnel to a customer's front door.

In either case, the argument does not address the fact that customers recognize unsolicited packet injection as unacceptable ISP behavior. Without support metrics, we can argue all day about the efficacy of one method of delivery over another, but the fact remains that no sensible user would perceive e-mail and/or post of official notice from their ISP as overtly intrusive. With as much internal advertising as Comcast distributes amongst its existing customers, it blows my mind that official notice generated from boilerplate and delivered via snail mail would fail to achieve the intended goal.

To be sure, your pre-edited comment: > Surely showing up in-person at their door must be an even more effective "reminder" than the browser injection! Is that next?

Re:Comcast is injecting 400+ lines of JavaScript into web pages by octalmage on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:27AM (#15892090)
Time Warner did show up at my door when they updated their speeds. I thought it was strange,and asked him to have Time Warner call and schedule a time, but it worked. He was going door to door.