Re:Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008) [pdf]
by Frogolocalypse on Saturday December 09, 2017 @11:02PM
(#15889814)
> You trust the hashpower in the aggregate
Are you explaining your definition of a trust requirement in a trustless protocol?
> by definition bitcoin is not secure.
It is not secure if you use your understanding of how bitcoin works. Which, as we've demonstrated with the four failed fork attempts, is not rooted in reality.
Are you explaining your definition of a trust requirement in a trustless protocol?
> by definition bitcoin is not secure.
It is not secure if you use your understanding of how bitcoin works. Which, as we've demonstrated with the four failed fork attempts, is not rooted in reality.