News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cards Against Humanity Redistributes Your Wealth by jquery on Saturday December 09, 2017 @08:17PM (#15889197)
If $1000 is life changing money for you, you have no business spending $15 on a lottery ticket, unless you are terrible at managing money, which might have something more to do with their situation more than living in the richest nation on Earth.
Re:Cards Against Humanity Redistributes Your Wealth by petercampanelli on Saturday December 09, 2017 @08:33PM (#15889264)
You're casting so much judgement here. Anyone can spend money on whatever they choose, just like the recipients can spend the $1000 however they like. We have no business criticizing these people.
Re:Cards Against Humanity Redistributes Your Wealth by jquery on Saturday December 09, 2017 @08:53PM (#15889354)
If Cards Against Humanity is going to demand wealth redistribution to support these people, you're goddamn right I can judge the financial choices of their champions.
Re:Cards Against Humanity Redistributes Your Wealth by FLGMwt on Saturday December 09, 2017 @10:22PM (#15889677)
Hi.

The "wealth distribution" is entirely at CAH's expense. They only surfaced that language because they made a point of communicating to the non-recipients that they wouldn't be receiving anything on top of their original contract (of getting the game for cash, which they totally got).

Re:Cards Against Humanity Redistributes Your Wealth by sctb on Sunday December 10, 2017 @01:43PM (#15892791)
You've broken the guidelines a lot in this thread by commenting uncivilly and/or unsubstantively. Would you please re-read them and then stop?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Cards Against Humanity Redistributes Your Wealth by paulv on Saturday December 09, 2017 @10:06PM (#15889630)
Poor people are allowed to have fun, too.

They "Deserve To Taste Something Other Than Shame", by Ijeoma Oluo: https://theestablishment.co/poor-people-deserve-to-taste-som...

Re:Cards Against Humanity Redistributes Your Wealth by FLGMwt on Saturday December 09, 2017 @10:19PM (#15889671)
Thanks for the input!

I realize I didn't clarify explicitly. While I'd agree that a one-time $15 gamble would be an irrationally exorbitant expense if it was in place of a family meal, I think we're talking about different things.

Even if "poor people" were <$1000 away from financial ruin, $15 towards a reusable entertainment asset is quite different than $15 towards one-off lottery tickets.