News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The fifth hyperfactorial: 5⁵ × 4⁴ × 3³ × 2² × 1¹ millisec... by gerdesj on Saturday December 09, 2017 @06:10PM (#15888728)
60 is the really important number. It does happen to have rather a lot of convenient factors. Cheers Babylon.

(I have checked the assertion and it is correct)

Re:The fifth hyperfactorial: 5⁵ × 4⁴ × 3³ × 2² × 1¹ millisec... by collinmanderson on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:47AM (#15892183)
I believe they split up a circle into 360 degrees because it's close to the number of days in the year.
Re:The fifth hyperfactorial: 5⁵ × 4⁴ × 3³ × 2² × 1¹ millisec... by ngcc_hk on Saturday December 09, 2017 @06:50PM (#15888867)
Finally less hate if barbarian. Sorry Babylonian.

10 hour 10 second easier.

A quarter pass 7.

(Actual 12 is a human number of look from earth. Both chi-na and ... is it a copy.)

Re:The fifth hyperfactorial: 5⁵ × 4⁴ × 3³ × 2² × 1¹ millisec... by stephengillie on Sunday December 10, 2017 @10:05AM (#15891680)
It's always bugged me there's no "metric time".

1 metric minute = 100 seconds = 1.667 Babylonian minutes

1 metric hour = 100 metric minutes = 166.7 Babylonian minutes = 2.78 Babylonian hours.

1 day = 8.61 metric hours = 1436 Babylonian minutes = 23.93 Babylonian hours.

Thoughts?

Re:The fifth hyperfactorial: 5⁵ × 4⁴ × 3³ × 2² × 1¹ millisec... by todd8 on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:16AM (#15892028)
I've always thought that if we are redefining time units a better solution might be 100000 metric seconds in a day (making them a bit shorter than the existing 86400 in a day) and otherwise the same relationships you've suggested:

1 metric minute = 100 metric seconds

1 metric hour = 100 metric minutes

1 day = 10 metric hours.

Re:The fifth hyperfactorial: 5⁵ × 4⁴ × 3³ × 2² × 1¹ millisec... by theoh on Sunday December 10, 2017 @05:22PM (#15893805)
Re:The fifth hyperfactorial: 5⁵ × 4⁴ × 3³ × 2² × 1¹ millisec... by VMG on Sunday December 10, 2017 @11:16AM (#15892029)
If rather switch to a base-12 number system