And obviously it doesn't matter if the law is wrong, it's still the law. But in this instance, why do you believe it to be wrong?
It's certainly not as ridiculous an option as it was back before the difficulty adjustment fix when its supporters were promoting it as the fast option despite it usually taking days for transactions to confirm (supporters responding that block times were as low as a minute sometimes, and they were right... except it was a entirely bimodal distribution, with most of the time spent in the "hours per block" part).
However, the increased transaction capacity people are promoting is still about 100x its current transaction rate, and it's entirely unclear how well it'd handle scaling up by that much in practice. Especially since I'm pretty sure it lacks some of the scaling work that the original Bitcoin has. Also, the rampant dishonesty and all the attempts by sites and services owned by a guy with a major investment in it to trick people into thinking it is Bitcoin don't inspire confidence.
https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-wh...
Peer to peer cash.
Not "Gold", not "asset", but "Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash".