News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008) [pdf] by Frogolocalypse on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:05PM (#15884043)
You need a dictionary more than you need the white-paper :

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peer

> one that is of equal standing with another : equal

If you aren't running a node, you're not equal, and therefore, by definition, not a peer.

Re:Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008) [pdf] by CryptoPunk on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:08PM (#15884057)
You're totally ignoring my arguments. This is pretty much how every discussion with an advocate of 1-MB-block-Bitcoin and $100 transaction fees goes. It's bizarre.
Re:Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008) [pdf] by DINKDINK on Friday December 08, 2017 @11:47PM (#15884347)
People who wanted lower security in exchange for lower fees already got what they wanted with Bcash.

What problem do you have with people running the blockchain they prefer?

Re:Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008) [pdf] by unlimitless on Saturday December 09, 2017 @02:35AM (#15884735)
I feel you, you are correct btw.
Re:Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008) [pdf] by nickporter on Saturday December 09, 2017 @03:11AM (#15884839)
Fees are in sat/wu not $.
Re:Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008) [pdf] by CryptoPunk on Saturday December 09, 2017 @03:20AM (#15884861)
I'm using $ as a unit of account because people have a frame of reference for it. Any real world value can be described as its dollar equivalent, and frequently is for understandability.