Re:The Bitcoin Whales: 1,000 People Who Own 40 Percent of th...
by tCfD on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:28AM
(#15879299)
If you subscribe to the Bitcoin in-universe dogma that views committing fraud and extortion as something that central banks and governments do, not what free market actors entering into voluntary contractual agreements with one another (which are regulated by math and logic spelled out in open source code) do, then maintaining good opsec is not just good business but a moral imperative.
Re:The Bitcoin Whales: 1,000 People Who Own 40 Percent of th...
by vidarh on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:52AM
(#15879513)
Lets say you never maintain much in the exchange, and always tumble coins before moving them in/out.
It would certainly be possible to prove identity when transferring BTC in/out of an exchange, but make it exceedingly hard to prove that they ultimately make it to/from wallets you control.
But of course possible does not mean it is likely.
Don't exchanges verify identity? Wouldn't you be committing fraud by maintaining good opsec?
Point being is that someone may eventually leak an exchange database with those details. Then the word's out. Kind of like Equifax.