News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by autokad on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:02AM (#15879055)
same here. i work great in teams, masters in computer science, do really well in kaggle competitions, I understand when to use the algorithms, how they work, etc.

but in the very few ds interviews I had, I was tanked as soon I got asked questions like: whats the formula for a T test. I know what the test is, and when its not appropriate to apply it, but I don't memorize those kinds of formulas. the field is just too big to do that

Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by alergico on Friday December 08, 2017 @12:41PM (#15880397)
Try looking for a company that does take-home assignments (these are mostly Kaggle-type problems). Then you don't need to learn formulas by rote, and the interview can focus on the assignment you did.

Experimental design (statistics) is important, but data science is a team sport. The people specialized in statistics may not be able to code up a deep net, and vice versa.

Computer scientists make great data scientists, especially if you know data infra. If I were to start a team from scratch, I'd focus on software engineers and physicists. Most are willing to pick up some ML to broaden their skills, and the ability to go end-to-end from conception to production is invaluable.

Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by em500 on Friday December 08, 2017 @11:31AM (#15879858)
I'm sorry but a standard t-test is like the most basic thing in statistics after means and variances. It's not like they want you prove the CLT or something. To me it's more like a statistics fizz-buzz.
Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by steve_gh on Friday December 08, 2017 @12:07PM (#15880132)
To which, of course, the correct answer is "Unless you have good reason to believe the data is normally distributed, you should be using Mann-Whitney", then explain that :-)
Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by thousandautumns on Friday December 08, 2017 @01:38PM (#15880793)
Thats not really true though. The vast majority of t-tests are done using a sample average as a test statistic, and by the CLT, as the sample size goes up, the distribution of a sample average becomes approximately normal. So unless you have a really weak sample size, the t-test assumption holds even in the absence of normally distributed data.
Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by neuromantik8086 on Friday December 08, 2017 @01:31PM (#15880743)
Excuse me, I think that at this juncture a Kruskal-Wallis would be more appropriate (assuming multiple distributions).
Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by crescentfresh on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:11AM (#15879128)
Thanks for sharing your experience!

Were you making it past the initial stage/screen interviews where every question is a buzz-word test? Were you ever interviewed by people who you'd actually work with and know what their team needs? What geographical area do you reside roughly, if I may ask?

Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by autokad on Friday December 08, 2017 @10:27AM (#15879287)
it was initial screenings, she was a data scientist (but really a statistician). I passed the first two screenings (code interview, database / sql interview). every question was about statistics, and probability.

This position was in NYC.

Re:Why Are Data Science Leaders Running for the Exit? by rockinghigh on Friday December 08, 2017 @12:09PM (#15880151)
For many companies, data science means statistics. Statistics are used for experiments and to analyze data. If you don't know what a t-test is, you cannot be hired as a statistician. However, you may be hired as a machine learning engineer.