Integration tests are a symptom of poor design

Re:Integration tests are a symptom of poor design by vlunkr on Thursday December 07, 2017 @12:00AM (#15867728)

I feel like some of these comments are just reading the title and immediately posting their disagreement. I'm with you, he says he writes integration tests himself. There's nothing controversial about this post, it's actually pretty interesting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Integration tests are a symptom of poor design by mannykannot on Thursday December 07, 2017 @07:57AM (#15869582)

After reading the article, I thought the person posting to HN had either misunderstood it or misappropriated it for his own agenda - but then I saw that it was apparently posted by the author himself.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Integration tests are a symptom of poor design by KentBeck on Thursday December 07, 2017 @10:05AM (#15870545)

There's a challenge finding the right headline when posting to HN. My last few posts had very literal headlines and went nowhere. I amped this headline up a bit while making sure it was still honest and, looky here, it got more attention. Now I have to decide how I feel about the difference.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Integration tests are a symptom of poor design by mannykannot on Thursday December 07, 2017 @07:55PM (#15875833)

FWIW, it doesn't bother me. Perhaps phrasing amped-up headlines as questions would forestall at least the more moderate wing of the clickbait squad?

[ Parent | on HN ]