News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin by colordrops on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @07:19PM (#15866425)
I don't think most reputable proponents have been saying that for years though.

In any case, the internet was designed as a communication medium that could survive nuclear war. That's how it was sold by its proponents. So what.

Re:Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin by jsmthrowaway on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @07:20PM (#15866432)
> I don't think most reputable proponents have been saying that for years though.

Define reputable.

> Announcing the first release of Bitcoin, a new electronic cash system

http://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org...

> Instant transactions for points-of-sale

http://web.archive.org/web/20130805223235/http://bitcoin.org...

(That verbiage lasted most of 2013, but was removed a couple days after this capture, presumably because payments were starting to become less "instant.")

> Bitcoin is a new payment system, independent from the traditional financial sector, and this could provide resilience to the economy in case of a crisis, as it creates a parallel payment system.

Understanding Bitcoin: Cryptography, Engineering, and Economics by Pedro Franco, 2010, pp. 26.

> You can purchase video games, gifts, books, servers, and alpaca socks. [...] Bitcoins are a great way for small businesses and freelancers to get noticed. It doesn't cost anything to start accepting them [...] and you'll get additional business from the Bitcoin economy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Um63OQz3bjo

Bitcoin has literally been presented as a replacement for cash payments since day 1. I could go on, and on. That history is now being rewritten, and I think it’s important to understand why. Bitcoin set out to do one thing, is failing at that one thing, and I’m discouraged to see people rewrite the narrative rather than own it and say it didn’t work for that.

And you've mixed up your history: the research grants into the Internet were funded for that purpose, but it quickly morphed into an alternative usage once the new abilities were seen. Nobody went out and pulled out full page newspaper ads with that intent for its design, or otherwise heralded the Internet as such.

Re:Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin by LsDmT on Thursday December 07, 2017 @01:00AM (#15867955)
Are you of the opinion bitcoins development is done? User adoption has skyrocketed and far surpassed expectation. The first ever Lightning Network transaction happened today. Bitcoin is still early technology and it will take time to developers a p2p secure digital form if cash.

Ethereum, the supposed answer to bitcoins problem has just recently began to see the exact same problem. Why? Because of a dumb kitten game - what happens once even a single ICO finds an moderate amount of user base?

These are early times friend

Re:Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin by hossbeast on Thursday December 07, 2017 @02:20AM (#15868328)
"The first ever Lightning Network transaction happened today". Do you have a source for this where I can read more?
Re:Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin by hossbeast on Friday December 08, 2017 @11:41PM (#15884330)
Did my own research. They're further along than I thought.

“Lightning Protocol 1.0: Compatibility Achieved ” https://medium.com/@lightning_network/lightning-protocol-1-0...

Re:Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin by omegaham on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @08:00PM (#15866668)
But the Internet accomplishes that. The fact that it also accomplishes everything else is a bonus.

BTC doesn't do its original job, and the current value on it, aside from idiots looking for a get-rich-quick scheme, seems to be that it will eventually do its original job.