Re:How to Build a City That Doesn’t Flood? Turn It into a Sp...
by Feniks on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @02:36PM
(#15864182)
To be fair just paving over everything is a cheap and immediate solution. Lots of towns don't have the money for maintaining greenery.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How to Build a City That Doesn’t Flood? Turn It into a Sp...
by hnzix on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @06:11PM
(#15866038)
"To be fair just dumping your waste into rivers is a cheap and immediate solution. Lots of companies don't have the money for safe disposal."
Re:How to Build a City That Doesn’t Flood? Turn It into a Sp...
by quickthrower2 on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @06:24PM
(#15866110)
Generically:
To be fair just <something low cost, but high externalized cost> is a cheap and immediate solution. Lots of companies don't have the money for <high cost, low externalized cost>
Re:How to Build a City That Doesn’t Flood? Turn It into a Sp...
by hnzix on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @09:02PM
(#15867006)
Where high externalized cost is a long-term negative impact on a community, which ranges from undesirable to unethical depending on context.
"Kicking the can down the road" should be called out and minimized. The HN hivemind usually frowns on regulations, but I don't see another practical solution for protecting the community from environmental hazards?