Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by talmand on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @01:34PM (#15863601)

I think a clear photograph of the person committing the misdeeds would be useful, but not for everybody it seems.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by maxerickson on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @02:39PM (#15864209)

Well yes of course that would be useful.

But let's try again. What's the least amount of evidence that you would find dispositive?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by owebmaster on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @07:32PM (#15866507)

If the accused accuses back, the lack of proofs (despite evidences) would be an evidence of the plot.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by minimaxir on Thursday December 07, 2017 @08:46AM (#15869886)

The absense of evidence is not evidence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time Person of the Year 2017: The Silence Breakers by owebmaster on Friday December 08, 2017 @12:44PM (#15880413)

Unless you have tens of accusers and no proof. Not talking about the case, but sure a lot of accusations without proof could be a plot.

[ Parent | on HN ]