That yearbook is the only physical evidence presented yet it seems to be forgery. That doesn't bode well for the veracity of the allegations from that accuser or the level of due diligence offered by Gloria Allred.

There are two pieces and the only one claiming forgery, is Roy Moore's camp (Shocking, i know)

Roy Moore's camp is also asking the yearbook be handed over to a third-party for analysis but so far the request has been ignored.

it was examined by Mark Songer an ex-FBI Forensic Examiner. And now there is a second piece of evidence.

On a side note, Man, you guys will go to some great lengths in your misinformation. I can understand some critical thought, but its like talking to defense attorneys.

Just a note: since this discussion was had the lady in question has admitted that a portion of the yearbook entry was indeed forged by her. The portion that a great number of people online claimed looked suspicious that was also looked at by the WAPO's expert.

>We did not ask the expert to examine the printing after the cursive writing and signature,” Allred said Friday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/roy-moore-accuser-a...

Oh, well that was very convenient for them wasn't it?

argumentum ad consequentiam