News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On Making Oneself Less Unreadable by m52go on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @07:10PM (#15857420)
I haven't read Fowler's original work, but I found the samples in this article to be hard to understand (i.e., a tad bit unreadable).

Still, as someone who runs a couple of services to help people write more concisely, I agree with most of his advice.

And although it has nothing to do with Fowler, the title of the article itself was confusing. I almost didn't click on it because I thought it was talking about personality, not writing (since it mentions "oneself," not one's writing). Then the double-negative.

A better title would be something like "On Making Your Writing More Readable."

But then it wouldn't be accepted for publication in The Paris Review, would it..."literary critics’ words" (!).

Re:On Making Oneself Less Unreadable by Bobbleoxs on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @08:07AM (#15860781)
Think that's deliberate.

PS; you need to consider the context, the author is an heir to Samuel Johnson and was active in late 1800 to 1930s. For that period, I think his entries were probably considered 'plain' English.

Re:On Making Oneself Less Unreadable by tome on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @05:13AM (#15859947)
> the title of the article itself was confusing

Isn't it a joke?

Re:On Making Oneself Less Unreadable by m52go on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @11:09AM (#15862166)
Ah, maybe. But I think a title is a risky thing to make into a joke, especially in this day and age (clicks), if it obfuscates its own meaning.
Re:On Making Oneself Less Unreadable by yesenadam on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @07:37PM (#15857555)
Shouldn't that be "a tad unreadable"?