C++17 Standard Published

Re:C++17 Standard Published by JamesUtah07 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:53PM (#15856378)

Do I really have to pay for a pdf of the standard? (sorry I just don't see anyway else to download the pdf)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by kachnuv_ocasek on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:57PM (#15856410)

Yep. You can download the latest working draft from open-std.org though: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/n470...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by kccqzy on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:58PM (#15856422)

Just go to https://github.com/cplusplus/draft for drafts. Choose a draft version that is produced right before the actual date of standardization and there are only very minor differences between the draft and the real deal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by vortico on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @11:53PM (#15858632)

Yes, I should emphasize that the minor differences are really minor and mostly typographical. There's no reason to need the published copy over the draft unless you're IBM working on icc, one of the head gcc maintainers, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by corndoge on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:57PM (#15856416)

Someone will upload it on libgen within a few days

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by w8rbt on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @05:23PM (#15856610)

That is illegal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by corndoge on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @10:35AM (#15861836)

cool story

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by symlinkk on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @05:48PM (#15856821)

and?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:C++17 Standard Published by moocowtruck on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @09:45PM (#15858090)

maybe he's a lawman

[ Parent | on HN ]