Re:CryptoKitties craze slows down transactions on Ethereum
by calvinlh on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @01:35PM
(#15854316)
https://www.google.com/search?q=2^256
You're off by about 68 orders of magnitude; it's 2^32 that's approximately 4 billion.
Re:CryptoKitties craze slows down transactions on Ethereum
by rspeer on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @01:41PM
(#15854381)
This is what the person you are replying to was pointing out, yes, using sarcastic understatement.
Re:CryptoKitties craze slows down transactions on Ethereum
by djtriptych on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @02:32PM
(#15854969)
Really thought that 5th 'u' in juuuuust would have implied the sarcasm tag
Re:CryptoKitties craze slows down transactions on Ethereum
by shakestheclown on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:13PM
(#15856048)
Six is the minimum.
> The kitties' unique DNA can lead to four billion possible genetic variations.
Erm 2^256 is juuuuust a bit more than 4 billion. This seems like an error.