Re:Are “landscrapers” the new skyscrapers?
by wst_ on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @09:58AM
(#15861445)
Matter of taste, I believe... For me this public floor wouldn't be a waste. You could have boutiques, newspapers stand, florist or cafe, you name it, similarly to ground floors. When you have 50 floors "wasting" one or two for the connection shouldn't be a big deal. Of course everything boils down to how well is it designed and implemented and how many people actually uses it. In my place there are skyways between big department stores. Only two and not that spectacular but it works nice, is convenient, doesn't spoil overall architecture. I'd gladly see more such solutions in future.
Re:Are “landscrapers” the new skyscrapers?
by romwell on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @10:04PM
(#15858156)
Hah, interesting. I'll make a detour through Cedar Rapids next time I'm in the area to check them out - the disadvantages are far from obvious.
Re:Are “landscrapers” the new skyscrapers?
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @09:29AM
(#15861233)
Further you need a map to figure out where to go next. The locals all know, but to the uninitiated its a maze. So you get confused folks wandering into the wrong places all the time.
We have these in downtown Cedar Rapids. Its awful.