Re:Apple CEO backs China’s ‘open’ Internet vision as censors...
by Chaebixi on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @11:50AM
(#15852997)
> If N companies pulled out of China and it didn't liberalise, they've incurred a cost for no benefit. If N+1 pulled out and it did trigger China to liberalise, they'd benefit from doing it.
> The trick is finding the N+1 companies and convincing them they're enough to be the trigger.
It seems like China has been pretty successful at preventing the actual dependence on foreign companies needed for that strategy to have its indented effect. For instance, if Apple pulls out, Chinese who can afford an iPhone are just going to have to settle for a Huawei.
The only chance I see is a general reduction in trade or foreign-driven manufacturing hurting the overall Chinese economy, but that would take a lot of companies to accomplish.
https://9to5mac.com/2017/05/23/iphone-market-share-gartner-q...
Re:Apple CEO backs China’s ‘open’ Internet vision as censors...
by mistermann on Wednesday December 06, 2017 @11:38AM
(#15862450)
The funny thing is, not doing this is just kicking the can down the road. Chinese companies with their protected access to the gigantic and prosperous Chinese market, will eventually be "good enough" to crush all others, across virtually all markets.
Re:Apple CEO backs China’s ‘open’ Internet vision as censors...
by emodendroket on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @09:42AM
(#15851944)
I mean it's probably more effective to make it more painful for them not to act than to act.
If N companies pulled out of China and it didn't liberalise, they've incurred a cost for no benefit. If N+1 pulled out and it did trigger China to liberalise, they'd benefit from doing it.
The trick is finding the N+1 companies and convincing them they're enough to be the trigger.