Re:Reflecting on Haskell in 2017
by harry8 on Monday December 04, 2017 @02:37AM
(#15842211)
34 items on that list. Looking at the content I don't think it's fair to use it as much of a datapoint you'd have to reduce that 34 number down yet it's missing git annexe, xmonad and pandoc which exist and are well used! Also as you point out it notes that it's obsolete. Next to where it notes that the list is obsolete it links here: https://wiki.haskell.org/Libraries_and_tools
Which buries applications in libraries and makes it challenging to get the actual list of applications, which is what I want here and is just one useful datapoint (of many). There is definitely a very long list of haskell libraries, many of which are excellent - this is a separate datapoint that can be considered separately or indeed in concert once we have the actual datapoint of the haskell applications that exist, are used and used for something that isn't programming.
Which buries applications in libraries and makes it challenging to get the actual list of applications, which is what I want here and is just one useful datapoint (of many). There is definitely a very long list of haskell libraries, many of which are excellent - this is a separate datapoint that can be considered separately or indeed in concert once we have the actual datapoint of the haskell applications that exist, are used and used for something that isn't programming.