News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Find every domain someone owns automatically by stanislavb on Saturday December 02, 2017 @11:00PM (#15835886)
Although it didn't work as I expected.
Re:Find every domain someone owns automatically by mxpxrocks10 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @11:02PM (#15835893)
Hey, we're still kind of new and kicking the tires. Any UX feedback or data feedback is appreciated!
Re:Find every domain someone owns automatically by regecks on Saturday December 02, 2017 @11:32PM (#15835972)
It's pretty much missing or empty data for the entire .au TLD (e.g. even google.com.au is not present).

Living here, I know that their whois server rate limits heavily and the ccTLD zonefile is not available, so I'm guessing those are probably contributing reasons. Do you guys do any crawling at all?

I think this is a fantastic concept though. Knowing that whois database and zonefile access is often protected for commercial motivations, it really irks me. Open it all up.

Re:Find every domain someone owns automatically by mxpxrocks10 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @11:36PM (#15835984)
right now we're getting .au domains from Open Crawl. It's tricky because the zone file is not available like you mentioned. If anyone has any ideas on how to get more .au domains, we'll gladly implement.
Re:Find every domain someone owns automatically by hughesey on Sunday December 03, 2017 @08:48AM (#15837544)
There's some reverse engineered zone files for a lot of cctlds at http://viewdns.info/data/.
Re:Find every domain someone owns automatically by jlgaddis on Sunday December 03, 2017 @12:33AM (#15836120)
CT logs come to mind, if you aren't using them already.

DNS queries, if you have access to recursive resolvers.

Re:Find every domain someone owns automatically by mxpxrocks10 on Sunday December 03, 2017 @12:58AM (#15836189)
we're using CT logs for getting hostnames (you can see it at the top of the page of any domain).

We have a great recursive resolver source but haven't been able to integrate it into the data pipeline yet.

thanks for the note and ideas!