News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:****** No Bootcamp Applicants ****** by Barrin92 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @05:50PM (#15834670)
that's not what I said at all. All I want to avoid is that women pick up bootcamp educations in the hope to get a job, fall short in interviews based on merit, and then end up stigmatized as second grade candidates. Which can easily happen if only certain demographics pick up a specific education path, that can't objectively compete with the expectations these people face in their jobs.

Don't sacrifice the quality of education just to pursue an egalitarian end, it will backfire and get you the exact opposite result of what you want.

Re:****** No Bootcamp Applicants ****** by ajross on Saturday December 02, 2017 @05:55PM (#15834701)
> that's not what I said at all

Whoosh, as it were. The point is that when you say that, it is what some other people hear. And that forcing disadvantaged demographics to read your mind to tell whether you're simply naive or a sexist jerk is hurting all of us. There are principles at work here beyond "sacrificing the quality of education".

The bottom line is that you aren't being nearly as welcoming as you think you are.

Re:****** No Bootcamp Applicants ****** by Barrin92 on Saturday December 02, 2017 @06:17PM (#15834841)
sorry but my job when interviewing someone isn't to be welcoming. My job is to be fair, assess the person's qualification and experience because businesses work with restricted time and information.

The interviewer will never know your entire backstory and needs to make a decision relatively quickly. If I would start to be overly empathetic or sensible, I would arguably start making biased and bad decisions based on personal gut feelings. That's what I need to avoid, not encourage.