Re:Uber's use of encrypted messaging may set legal precedents
by puppetmaster40 on Friday December 01, 2017 @04:25PM
(#15827655)
I recall a case where after a subpoena for records hard drives were wiped clean and mobile phones where smashed with a hammer. So what is it, OK to destroy or not as a legal precedent?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber's use of encrypted messaging may set legal precedents
by amiga-workbench on Friday December 01, 2017 @05:35PM
(#15828343)
Oh, that was just extreme carelessness ;^)