News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf] by amarkov on Thursday November 30, 2017 @02:11PM (#15818574)
> How is it not assured that bitcoin will evolve? It evolves all the time. Are you even following the project?

I mean, are you even following the project? Very, very basic changes like "let's change this parameter from 1 to 2" are incredibly contentious, leading to hard forks and loud debates and furious accusations that people are shills trying to ruin Bitcoin for personal profit. If we can't even behave ourselves for a trivial proposal like Segwit2x, how could a truly significant protocol change ever get anywhere?

Re:Is Filecoin a $257 million Ponzi scheme? [pdf] by keymone on Thursday November 30, 2017 @02:36PM (#15818800)
Bumping blocksize is contentious hardfork because not everybody is convinced it is the right way to scale (and i somewhat agree). Segwit otoh was implemented as backward compatible soft fork. Segwit2x is a deliberate attack on the network and i’m happy it failed.

Overall everybody got what they wanted - big blockers have BCH, conservatives have original BTC plus the capacity increase from segwit.