News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on BTC addresses whose private keys are from SHA256 of another public address. Parent comment

Re:BTC addresses whose private keys are from SHA256 of anoth... by tgb on Thursday November 30, 2017 @10:08AM (#15816275)
Might as well link directly to the source: https://pastebin.com/jCDFcESz which really I think should be the article URL anyway (the tweet just links here too). Very interesting find!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BTC addresses whose private keys are from SHA256 of anoth... by _Marak_ on Thursday November 30, 2017 @10:17AM (#15816357)
I checked, the pastebin link was submitted an hour ago to HN and was immediately marked as [dead].
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BTC addresses whose private keys are from SHA256 of anoth... by noobermin on Thursday November 30, 2017 @10:41AM (#15816544)
Meta comment, but this is why it is beneficial for users to vouch for good articles so they don't get lost on the new page.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BTC addresses whose private keys are from SHA256 of anoth... by Bromskloss on Thursday November 30, 2017 @11:24AM (#15816978)
Is it still possible to link to?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:BTC addresses whose private keys are from SHA256 of anoth... by lloeki on Thursday November 30, 2017 @10:51AM (#15816660)
Ah I expected the pastebin to just be the list of addresses, not a full wwriteup.
[ Parent | on HN ]